Student Perceptions,
Roles and Engagement
When ICT
is used to support learning it is intended that this should increase the
engagement
of students and in most cases
increase their independence, so that students are not only required to use ICT competently but may also be
required to adjust to changes in their role. That is, using
ICT has implications for students beyond their ICT literacy into their perceptions of and preferences for their roles as
learners. Early discussions have highlighted
that in many cases the students’ role becomes more:
• Independent
and responsible
• Cooperative
and collaborative
• Directive
and negotiative
Students
need to develop skills associated with time and resource management, concentration,
self-discipline, attention to task and ability to follow instructions. Any
changes in role and requirement for new sets of skills needs to be introduced
and supported carefully with consideration for those students with opposing
perceptions and inadequate previous experience. In a recent Western Australian
study with a Year Eight class using computers it was found that while almost
all of the students had good ICT skills and positive attitudes there was a tendency
for students to want to work by themselves and depend on the teacher (approximately
50%), that was not conducive to computer supported project work and independent
online activities.
An
important issue is that students respond to and use computers in different
ways. It is clear from research that most students like using computers
although usually at least 5% do not. In a 1991 survey of the MLC students using
laptop computers, 95% liked using their laptops, and most students preferred
the appearance of work completed on a computer, with 85% preferring it to paper
and pen, dependent on the task (Loader, 1993). Rowe (1993) found that children
differed markedly in their use of laptops and the effectiveness of that use.
She defined two groups of students, the top and bottom 20% in terms of computer
expertise based on student and teacher rankings. She also developed a set of
indicators of effective laptop
use that were used for profile matching to create four groups of students: orchestrators, amplifiers, machinists, perseverators.
Orchestrators were seen as those whointertwine learning and computer use and
were confident computer users. Amplifiers
regarded the computer as a separate area of learning while machinists viewed the computer as
non-essential, mainly for use in calculation and word processing. Finally, perseverators
made limited use of computers, mainly copying others and using drill and
practice packages.
The sense
of personal identity is an important issue for learners, particularly for
children. There is no doubt that most educators would see value in students
being able to personalize the tools they use and this is very much the case
with computer systems. In parallel with other forms of literacy, Rowe (1993) emphasizes
the importance of computer literacy and that a student “make the computer part
of oneself” (p. 71). This is more readily accomplished where the user interface
can be customized by the student and the array of tools available can match the
needs of the student. However, this means that in a class every student’s
system will be different, making it more difficult for teachers and support personnel
to provide technical and operational support to the student. This means that
the student must be more independent in the use of the computer. In many school
situations students are not permitted to customise their own interface, and
that may lead to less engagement and empowerment for students.
The
provision of more flexible access to ICT requires greater personal
responsibility which may be lacking in some students. For example many studies
have shown that students will use their computer systems for inappropriate
activities from downloading offensive material to playing games during class
activity time. This problem was highlighted by a report by SRI International
(Crawford & Vahey, 2002) on the use of Palm Pilots in schools where
teachers reported some problems with “game playing and off-task beaming” (p.
i). On the other hand the report found that some teachers reported positive
unplanned uses of the PDAs due to student “discovery of additional software”
(p. 41) which is more likely when the students are given more flexible and
responsible access.
Does the
use of ICT lead to greater engagement and thus improved learning outcomes? Reiger
and Gay (n.d.) conducted research on the value of handheld computers to collect
data and provide multimedia information on field excursions for students. Their
findings were preliminary and inconclusive. Walker, Rockman, and Chessler
(2000) found that the students using laptops had improved writing skills and
confidence in computer use in comparison to other students, but results on
standardized tests were inconclusive. Some students may become frustrated
when they perceive that their ICT skills are being underestimated and
under-utilised (Becta, 2002).



